On paper, the charge of idealism with realities of the 2013 Curriculum is the practice of education in the region.
Starting from 2013 dotted curriculum idea to seize the opportunities of demographic bonus in the next three decades. The goal of this curriculum is to print a character generation 2045 noble, independent, democratic, and accountable. The thematic approach is integrative, this curriculum develops core competencies as a horizontal integrator that binds the whole subject and level of education as a whole.
In practice at the elementary level-junior high school, the curriculum is dissolved material a number of subjects into other subjects. The number of subjects was reduced so that the structure of the curriculum was impressed and concise.
As education strategy, curriculum 2013 positioned as critical nodes in the process of consolidating democracy. In one of his article, Vice President Boediono explained that education is the key to determining the progress of the development (compass, 27/8/2012). This new curriculum formulation was inspired by the experience of the United States that puts the institution of education as the main pillars of democracy.
Substantively, this idea of putting the student in two-sided role as citizens of the democratic system and its human resource system economic player. Public education to equip students with the basic skills and attitudes (soft skills) for work to be good citizens. Meanwhile, special education provide skills ready to work (hard skills) in specific areas.
The Government is also preparing a strategy for the alignment of the curriculum with a background of teachers. There are three elements supporting implementation, i.e. the availability of books as a guide to learning materials and learning resources, strengthening the role of local governments in building and strengthening supervision and management of school culture.
Currently, the first team was set up consisting of core teachers as the spearhead of the new curriculum's implementation in the field.
Is a reality
However, it seems to kick on top of still strong on paper. The relevance of the national education policy on the one hand with the condition of the infrastructure of education on the other hand became a central theme in the survey on Teachers and quality Compass national education 2013. This trawl survey opinion 512 teachers from elementary and JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS public and private in eight provincial capitals.
As a result, in the outline of Government policy in the field of education is relative when confronted on the ability of teachers in the area.
A number of policies, such as the provision of school facilities and infrastructure, curriculum changes from time to time, teacher certification, and standardization of the national exam, is a macro policy benefit is with the education practice in the everyday life of teachers and pupils. Teacher certification, for example, do not touch directly with individual character and ability aspects of the teacher. The majority of teachers are rated mediocre type that tends to still have limitations in enrichment material and teaching methods. The role of teachers is also implementing the curriculum, as part of the educational bureaucracy.
This condition causes the Curriculum becomes problematic in the 2013 its implementation considering this curriculum requires the competence of educators and educational personnel (PTK). Moreover, the teacher shows the orientation of the value of the complex, with a range of understanding, namely the continuum is conservative in religious values on the one hand, but Liberals in understanding education.
Ahead of the two-month implementation, socialization Curriculum 2013 is still saggy in the field. The survey showed a still very minimal socializing in a number of areas. New socialization as a formality on the SD-top favorite JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL in urban areas. It was not able to guarantee an optimal understanding of the curriculum of 2013.
In fact, this curriculum changes require changes in paradigm thinking teachers teaching approach and related techniques, especially on subjects that are integrated, such as IPA, IPS, and language. In addition, changes in the structure of the curriculum also poses a number of technical issues such as hours of teaching per week teacher certification is not met and the excess power of teachers as a result of a number of subjects were removed.
Ideally, the 2013 Curriculum followed by teacher training for a new idealism can be caught more whole and implemented optimally. The teaching abilities of teachers currently is the result of higher education pedagogy refers to the old curriculum, the teachers at the elementary level was educated to master many fields taught at the elementary level. in the meantime, teachers are directed to JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL have kebidangan.
The confusion of such technical amendments reflect that the curriculum needs to be done gradually. The controversy that developed curriculum 2013 as long as it is inseparable from the difference between the Government's view as decisive policies on the central level and readiness of teachers as implementers in the area that has the ability.
Frame the democratization
Currently, the Government has lowered the target for the implementation of the curriculum of 2013. At the elementary level from 30 percent to 5 percent, the level of JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL of 20 percent to 7 percent. The new curriculum was implemented in grade I and IV at the elementary level and grade VII in the level of junior high school. As for the HIGH SCHOOL/SMK levels remain 100 percent in the class of X, that is applied in the HIGH SCHOOL and CMS 10.685 11.572 throughout Indonesia.
The display Windows of previous experience, the determination of the curriculum is the curriculum changes that 2013 is the third time since the reform of 1998. Substantially, has not seen the vision is related to frame the democratization. The school is still grappling to question the technical standardization and assessment of education. This issue must be cleared up first so that the curriculum does not simply be 2013 paper tiger.
(Wonderful Surya Wardhani/R & D Compass)
Rating: 100% based on 99998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank you for your coming, please leave your comment
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar