This step is necessary because of the serious attention it since the beginning of the existence of this Fund is full of awkwardness. Not only the matter of rules, the motive behind the enduring Education Fund eksisnya (DAP) three years later, also full of mystery. Although it is used for education became the authority and responsibility of the Ministry of culture and education, the STATE BUDGET ACT in the DAP called national education development fund initiated by former Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati (compass, 8/3/2010).
After DAP mewacanakan in March 2010, The DAP in Law Number insert 2 in 2010 about changes to the law No 47/2009 about the STATE BUDGET in 2010. STATE BUDGET ACT is then followed by the issuance of Permenkeu No. 238/FMD. 05/2010 regarding the provision of the Ordinance, liquefaction, management of, and accountability Endowment Fund and reserve fund Education in December 2010. In contrast to the perennial Fund collected from the community through its efficiency of organizing Hajj, DAP is taken directly from the 20 percent of the budget to education. The adjustment is 1 percent to 2 percent annually. In 2013, the DAP STATE BUDGET allocated Rp 5 trillion so the total DAP is currently reaching 15.6 trillion Rupiah (accumulated since early 2010).
No good terkonsep
This amount is very large, even exceeding the total budget for the Ministry/State agencies. Call it a budget at the Ministry of tourism and Creative Economy only Rp 2 trillion (2013), the Ministry of youth and sports, as well as Rp 1.9 trillion to Rp 477 billion National Library. The presence of this true no special DAP, except from the magnitude of the budget is allocated. These funds are also not terkonsep properly. According to Act No. 19/2012, enduring Education Fund (endowment fund) is used to guarantee the sustainability of the program of education for the next generation as a form of intergenerational responsibility. It is embodied inter alia by mengalokasikannya for scholarships and rehabilitation of educational facilities damaged by natural disasters. The Minister stated, the DAP will be allocated specifically for scholarships S-2 and S-3 of non-CIVIL SERVANTS and nondosen, research-based energy and food, as well as the rehabilitation of educational facilities as a result of the disaster.
The function budget, scholarship, research, start up true rehabilitation has been allocated in the regular budget beyond the DAP. If DAP is used to finance the same thing, for what is the DAP? The intention of utilizing Kemdikbud DAP for scholarships S-2 and S-3 nondosen and non-CIVIL SERVANTS also clearly does not meet the strategic plan (renstra) Kemdikbud 2010-2014 that it wants to increase the percentage of qualified lecturers education S-2 and S-3. In this, the Kemdikbud target renstra increased qualified lecturer S-2 to 85 percent and the S-3 qualified lecturers to 90 percent.
In addition, scholarships are only focused for S-2 and S-3 is also not linear with increasing effort of SMA/SMK APK (12 years of compulsory education). Because when the APK increases, prospective auto S-1 also increased, which is then needs funding of education to undergraduate level. Later, the STATE BUDGET ACT in the DAP is mentioned as a form of intergenerational responsibility gives the impression that one day we will run out of money shortages and to finance education. This view is indeed disputed Sri Mulyani who insists that the presence of the DAP is not a matter of lack of funding, but rather how to spend the budget properly (absorbance) (Cash, 13/3/2010).
This indicates, as Sri Mulyani Minister of finance at that time, did not believe in Kemdikbud in the management of the education budget. If then the reasonable education budget is 20 percent of the STATE BUDGET which ripped apart. From the start is divided into 18 ministries/institutions, transfers to the regions, the special allocation, to the provision of the post to DAP. In other words, the DAP was made the way meet a quota of 20 percent the budget for education, while simultaneously addressing the low absorbance of a big budget.
Misguided
Further, the management of public services by the DAP (BLU) is a misguided policy. Because BLU concept as stated in article 1 points (1) and (2) of REGULATION No 23/2005 is as the provision of goods and/or services sold (applying a healthy business practices). As for the DAP is the funds deposited and its revenue was just a flower. In other words, the DAP is not fresh capital (fresh capital) which used to do business.
Ironically, the Minister, as Minister of education-related and which will make use of the DAP, not overwhelm those funds. Because, under article 2, paragraph (2) Permenkeu No. 238/FMD. 05/2010, budget users are not the Minister Minister of DAP. The budget is increasingly wild as a partner because the Commission X Kemdikbud unable to supervise the use of the budget because the budget is under the grip of his term and completely under the supervision of kementeriannya.
The formation of the new BLU performed on 2012 and the disbursements will be made in the year is also questionable. The reason, DAP already budgeted since 2010. This triggered suspicion will likely magnitude absurdities DAP for political expediency. Moreover, the Fund proved to be susceptible to the eternal corruption. As a former corruption DAU dragging Minister of religious affairs Said Agil Husein Al Munawar. In addition, DAP in Aceh also alleged dikorupsi because, based on the findings of the NGO, the balance is already blank. Aceh DAP
In the end, House members who have the right budget must act. However mistakes cannot be addressed solely to the Government, given the STATE BUDGET ACT was born from the meeting of the HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Plenary hammer tap. The opportunity is still there, because a rule base is DAP STATE BUDGET; so P-2013 STATE BUDGET is the entrance of the commitment of the representatives of the people.
However, everything will be back in the political process. Will the most votes is given to Governments (continue) or vice versa (stop DAP)?
Sincere Santoso Experts Board member in the HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Commission X
Rating: 100% based on 99998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank you for your coming, please leave your comment
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar